“We are a technology company that happens to sell shoes.” This is the cliché opening line of every DTC pitch deck since 2015. It is usually a lie. Most brands are just “Retailers with a website.” They buy inventory (Wholesale), mark it up 2.5x, and sell it on Shopify using a standard theme and 15 standard apps. There is nothing wrong with this model. It generates cash. But it does not generate Enterprise Value (EV).

In the eyes of a Private Equity acquirer or the Public Markets, a “Retailer” is valued at 0.8x - 1.5x Revenue (or 6x EBITDA). A “Tech Platform” is valued at 5x - 15x Revenue.

The difference between a $10M exit and a $100M exit is rarely the shoes. It is the Intellectual Property (IP). This article explores the financial and strategic imperative of Owning Your Software.

Why Maison Code Discusses This

At Maison Code Paris, we operate at the intersection of Luxury Retail and High-Frequency Trading technology. We have seen the balance sheets of over 50 major European brands. We have observed a stark correlation: Brands that rent their capabilities (100% SaaS reliance) eventually hit a gross margin ceiling of 65% and a valuation ceiling of 1.5x. Brands that build their capabilities (Proprietary IP) Enable gross margins of 80%+ and valuations of 10x+. We write this not to sell you code, but to sell you Equity. Coding is just the mechanism. Wealth creation is the goal.

1. The Commodity Trap (Renters vs Owners)

The modern e-commerce stack is a miracle of efficiency. You can launch a global store for $29/month. But this efficiency has a dark side: Zero Barriers to Entry. If you use the Dawn Theme, Klaviyo, Gorgias, and Yotpo, you have the exact same infrastructure as your 10,000 competitors. You are renting your capabilities. If you are renting, you have no moat. If you have no moat, you compete on Price (Race to the bottom) or Ad Spend (Race to give all profit to Meta).

The “Pass-Through” Entity

Investors view brands built entirely on rented SaaS as “Pass-Through Entities.” You are just a middleman between the factory (China) and the customer (Instagram), paying a tax to Shopify for the privilege. To escape this trap, you must build something proprietary.

2. The Multiplier Effect: Case Studies

Let’s look at brands that broke the ceiling by treating software as a core asset.

Stitch Fix (The Algorithm)

Stitch Fix sells clothes. Just like T.J. Maxx. But T.J. Maxx trades at a retail multiple. Stitch Fix (at IPO) traded at a tech multiple. Why? Because they built a proprietary Styling Algorithm. They employed 100+ Data Scientists. They didn’t just buy clothes; they predicted what you wanted before you knew it. The “Software” was the product. The clothes were the fulfillment mechanism. When they went public, they didn’t list as a retailer. They listed as a Data Science company.

Warby Parker (The Home Try-On)

Warby Parker built a custom Home Try-On logistics engine and later a Virtual Try-On using AR. They didn’t use a generic “3D Viewer Plugin” from the App Store. They owned the code. This seamless experience became their brand identity. It allowed them to bypass the optical oligopoly (Luxottica) efficiently.

Glossier (The Community Tech)

Glossier started as a blog (Into The Gloss). They built custom technology to integrate community feedback into product development. They viewed their platform as a social network first, store second. Valuation: $1.8 Billion.

3. The Implementation: What to Build vs Buy

You should not build everything. This is a trap known as “Not Invented Here” syndrome. Building a custom Checkout (processing credit cards) is suicide. Building a custom ERP is madness.

We use the Core vs Context framework (Geoffrey Moore) to decide where to invest Capex.

Layer	Definition	Strategy	Example
Commodity	Accounting, Hosting, Payments	BUY	Stripe, AWS, NetSuite
Parity	Generic E-com Features	BUY	Shopify, Klaviyo
Differentiator	The “Secret Sauce”	BUILD	The Recommendation Engine, The Configurator, The Loyalty Logic

The “Black Box” Strategy

The smartest brands build a “Black Box” of IP that sits on top of Shopify.

The Front End: A Headless Custom storefront (Next.js) that offers a UX no template can match.
The Middle Ware: A custom API that connects your Inventory, Logistics, and Customer Data in a unique way.

Example: A custom “Build Your Own Bundle” engine. Standard App: “Pick 3 items for 10% off.” (Boring). Custom IP: “Take a Quiz -> We generate a personalized regimen -> Subscription auto-adjusts based on your usage.” (High Value). This logic cannot be bought. It has to be codified.

4. The Financials: Capex vs Opex

Retailers hate Capex (Capital Expenditure). They like variable costs. “Why pay $100k to build software when I can pay $50/month for an app?” This short-term thinking kills Valuation.

Scenario A: The Renter (Low EV)

Revenue: $10M.
Tech Stack: $5k/month in Apps. ($60k/year).
Asset Value: $0. (When you stop paying, the capability vanishes).
EBITDA Impact: -$60k/year.
Exit Multiple: 1.2x.
Exit Price: $12M.

Scenario B: The Owner (High EV)

Revenue: $10M.
Tech Stack: Custom Build ($500k Capex amortized over 5 years).
Asset Value: $500k (Proprietary Codebase listed on Balance Sheet).
EBITDA Impact: $0 (Capex is below the line, depreciation is added back).
Exit Multiple: 2.5x (Premium for IP and recurring revenue capability).
Exit Price: $25M.

The $500k investment yielded a $13M increase in Exit Value. That is a 26x ROI. No Facebook Ad campaign delivers 26x ROI. Only IP does.

5. Vendor Risk and Autonomy

(See Vendor Risk Management). When you build, you own the roadmap. When you rent, you are at the mercy of the landlord.

The Shopify App Tax

If you rely on a 3rd party app for your core subscription logic:

Price Hikes: They can raise prices 400% overnight (Yotpo did this).
Deprecation: They can shut down the feature you rely on.
Data Leakage: The “Free App” is often selling your customer data to your competitors.
Performance: Loading 30 apps slows your site by 3 seconds. Conversion drops 20%.

Owning your software is Sovereignty. It ensures that your Customer Experience (CX) cannot be degraded by a third party’s quarterly earnings pressure.

6. The Talent Gap: Agencies vs In-House

To own software, you need people who speak code. Most brands hire an Agency. The Agency Trap: Agencies optimize for Launch, not Lifespan. They build it fast, hand it over, and leave. The code rots. 6 months later, you can’t update it.

The Solution: The Technical Co-Founder (or Fractional CTO). You need someone on the Cap Table (or a retained partner like Maison Code) who treats the codebase as a living organism. They implement:

CI/CD Pipelines: Automated testing.
Documentation: So the next engineer knows what happens.
Refactoring: Paying down technical debt.

You don’t need a team of 50. One 10x Engineer is worth more than 10 mediocre ones. (See 10x Engineer).

7. The Skeptic’s View: “Software is Hard”

“I don’t savvy computers. I’m a merchant.” This is a valid fear. Software projects fail. They go over budget. They have bugs. But relying on Facebook Ads is also hard. The algorithm changes every week. The difference is: When you solve a Software problem, it stays solved. When you solve an Ad problem, you have to solve it again tomorrow. Software is Leverage. Ads are Labor.

8. Conclusion: The Equity Equation

Private Equity firms have a playbook:

Buy a “dumb” retailer.
Inject “smart” tech (Digital Transformation).
Sell it as a Tech-Enabled Brand for 3x the price.

Why let them take that arbitrage? Do it yourself. Stop viewing Engineering as a “Cost Center” on your P&L. Start viewing it as an “Equity Multiplier” on your Balance Sheet. The code you write today is the wealth you capture tomorrow.

Ready to build an asset?

Are you tired of the SaaS treadmill? We audit your IP Strategy and deploy high-value custom software architectures.

Hire our Architects.